logo
Log In Subscribe e-Edition Archives
logo
Log In Subscribe e-Edition Archives
Google Play App Store
  • News
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Photo Gallery
  • Columns/Opinions
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds
  • Public Notices
  • Special Sections
    • News
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Photo Gallery
    • Columns/Opinions
    • Obituaries
    • Classifieds
    • Public Notices
    • Special Sections
High Court Could Enter Jan. 6 Cases
Columns/Opinions
By Royal Alexander Attorney / Contributing Writer on
November 29, 2023
High Court Could Enter Jan. 6 Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide whether to accept Jan. 6 case appeals—the most significant case being the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) questionable use of an evidence-tampering law to prosecute Jan. 6 defendants for felony obstruction of Congress. If accepted it will be the first time a Jan. 6-related case is reviewed by the Supreme Court.

The case could affect hundreds of defendants accused of the most commonly charged Jan. 6 felony, “Corruptly Obstructing an Official Proceeding.” This charge involves a potential 20year prison term and has been charged in over 3oo cases. A number of the Jan. 6 defendants have already been convicted under the law, which had never been used in this manner since it was implemented to target corporate financial fraud in the wake of the Enron scandal.

This law addresses Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proceedings and investigations. The statute makes it clear that destroying evidence or otherwise hindering an SEC investigation is an obstruction of justice offense. DOJ has twisted this statute to “fit” January 6 cases, arguing that the Joint Session of Congress on January 6th was an “official proceeding” and that those protestors who arrived at the Capitol “obstructed” it. However, the DOJ has charged this offense against people who never went into the Capitol, and who were not even in Washington.

As the Petition notes, “unsatisfied with the penalties the violation of (lesser Misdemeanor) statutes might impose, and desiring to broadcast a louder and more compelling general deterrent message, the government transformed 18 U.S.C. Section 1512(c)(2) into something well beyond what Congress had in mind when it passed a law intended to punish interference with the integrity of evidentiary proceedings. This statute not only carries with it a potential 20-year prison sentence—it sends a chilling message to anyone contemplating attendance at a political rally: Stay home. If things go wrong, you could face charges of corruptly obstructing an official proceeding.”

I also note the Due Process requirement of “fair notice” which insures that “a person of ordinary intelligence be placed on notice” of what the law prohibits was not met here regarding these Jan 6 marchers.

Fortunately, thanks to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Shreveport, LA), Americans have an opportunity to challenge Democrats’ accusation that Trump supporters broke the law when he released 44,000 hours of video tapes, providing us the definitive look at what actually happened that day.

However, some review of this video has already occurred: “Jan. 6 Video of Capitol Rioter Fist-Bumping Police Raises Questions.” (Newsweek).

You think!?! Others have commented: X user Fighting For the Truth wrote, “Capitol police fist bump with J6r inside the Capitol. They were welcomed guests. Then arrested. That’s entrapment.” Podcaster and writer, Jeff Charles, wrote on X, “Capitol Police take supposed J6er aside, remove his handcuffs, then give him a fist bump. Now, why would they do this? Hmmmmm.”

Commentator Benny Johnson posted to X: “I don’t think Capitol Police would take restraints off of a protester, FIST BUMP him, and then let him go if this were an actual ‘insurrection.’” John Cremeans asserts “A Fist Bump? WTH! Capitol Police uncuff a January 6th Protestor and give him a fist bump. Something is definitely not right about the J6 Pelosi narrative.”

Writer Liz Peek of The Hill notes: “In a CNN poll conducted this past summer, only 29 percent of Republicans and right-leaning independents thought Biden’s election was legitimate, while 69 percent did not. Of the country overall, 38 percent think Biden is an illegitimate president. Given the concerted effort by the liberal media to squash such doubts and the ongoing vilification of “election-deniers,” that figure—roughly the same as it was on Jan. 6— is troubling.” (11/24/23).

The Hill article concludes: “In an era when career criminals are often released without bail, largescale theft is tolerated and progressive district attorneys refuse to prosecute even low-level felonies, the aggressiveness of the FBI in pursuing the Jan. 6 attendees hits a nerve. Many consider it politically motivated and yet another example of what some call our «two-tiered system of justice.» Millions of Americans have never believed the Pelosi/Left/ Media narrative of what occurred on Jan 6. The large majority of the marchers that day were simply exercising their 1st Amendment right to express themselves politically. We may prayerfully hope that the Supreme Court takes judicial notice of this newly released Jan 6 evidence if it decides to hear these cases, which it should.

ePaper
coogle_play
app_store
It might also interest you...
Happy Birthday, America!
A: Main, News...
Happy Birthday, America!
Unique celebration held in Jena - Fireworks in Olla
By Craig Franklin Editor 
July 9, 2025
Unique celebration held in Jena - Fireworks in Olla The United States of America’s 249th birthday celebration was held in grand fashion last Friday, J...
this is a test
Let’s Talk Church
Columns/Opinions
Let’s Talk Church
July 9, 2025
Let’s talk Church. If you were searching out information on some particular subject, you might do several things. One of which would be you would want...
this is a test
2025 Legislative Session Recap
A: Main, News
2025 Legislative Session Recap
Part 2 of 3
By Craig Franklin Editor 
July 9, 2025
Part 2 of 3 District 32 Sen. Glen Womack (EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the second of a three-part series featuring LaSalle’s Parish’s State Legislative Dele...
this is a test
No In-Parish Wrecker Service
A: Main, News
No In-Parish Wrecker Service
By Craig Franklin Editor 
July 9, 2025
At one time in LaSalle Parish, multiple wrecker services operated to meet the needs of transporting inoperable vehicles – either vehicles that needed ...
this is a test
New Pharmacy Law = Lower Prices
A: Main, News
New Pharmacy Law = Lower Prices
Residents urged to join effort to save local pharmacies
By Craig Franklin Editor 
July 9, 2025
Residents urged to join effort to save local pharmacies Olla Pharmacist Matthew Bullard is ecstatic about a new law that the Louisiana Legislature pas...
this is a test
Two Parish Principals’ Contracts Renewed
News
Two Parish Principals’ Contracts Renewed
By Craig Franklin Editor 
July 9, 2025
Two principals of LaSalle Parish schools had their contracts renewed as part of the LaSalle Parish School Board’s July 1 meeting held last week in Jen...
this is a test
ACE Circular
ePaper
coogle_play
app_store
ACE Circular
ePaper
coogle_play
app_store
Search Public Notices

The Jena Times
OLLA-TULLOS-URANIA SIGNAL
P: (318) 992-4121

Office Hours:
Mon-Fri, 8am-4pm
Sat-Sun, Closed

This site complies with ADA requirements

© The Jena Times

  • Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Accessibility Policy